The contractual configuration control authority approving the implementation of a change to a product (system/CI) may initially reside with a contractor or with the Government. It may transfer from the contractor to the Government, or may continue to reside with the contractor throughout the life cycle of the CI. This authority is technically responsible for the performance of the product as well as fiscally responsible for funding changes to the product.
The span of Configuration control begins for the Government once the first configuration document is approved and baselined. This normally occurs when the functional configuration baseline (referred to as the requirements baseline in EIA/IS-649) is established for a system or configuration item. Configuration control is an essential discipline throughout the program life cycle. Figure 6-1 illustrates a top-level activity model of the configuration control process.
Quality and experience have been optimized away, they are secondary.Email is a horrible form of communication[/quote]Obviously. No decent SCM tool relies upon email.Tools that track issues can also do the same thing[/quote]If you mean ticket processing tools, they are utterly unsuited to SCM. They also optimize one generic aspect of the communications at the expense of the information proper. Capture the decision after the project change request is approved; update the budget, schedule, and risks. As the scope, budget, and schedule are typically fixed at the start of the project, managing change can become problematic.
A project manager should be extremely careful when providing a CR assessment. The team might also accept larger changes but only as an exception to the rule. In such a case, the change will be added to the sprint backlog as a new story with another story of similar size moved to the next release. At the start of each iteration, the team gathers for a sprint planning session.
The concepts discussed below facilitate accomplishing this step, using automated tools such as a CM AIS. This handbook views these concepts from both program management point of view and the document control point of view. The product and product model life cycles are driven by the product adoption rate, illustrated below, that is commonly experienced by most engineered products . As products reach market saturation (i.e., on the down slope of the curve below) then there would typically be a new, upgraded version of the product ready for delivery to the marketplace. PSE serves a critical role in determining the best timing for delivery of this new version and the set of features and functions that would be of the greatest value at that time. Change Control Board The board that oversees the change process consisting of representatives from all interested parties, including customers, developers, and users. In a small project, a single team member, such as the project manager or software architect, may play this role.
All CCB members must be present at each CCB meeting and should be familiar, from their functional perspective, with the changes being considered. CCB members are obligated to make their position known to the chairperson; and ultimately to approving the CCB directive/order noting their agreement or disagreement with the decision. To approve the CCB Directive , a person must be the primary CCB member designated by the CCB charter. If the CDCA is the organization that proposed the change to the CCB, the CCB approves the funding and incorporation of the change to the product, while the CDCA approves the change to the document.
A change control board , is used to manage and oversee changes to the project scope, schedule, and budget. The CCB is typically composed of senior stakeholders from different parts of the organization. As mentioned above, audits can be carried out during the development process to investigate the current status of specific elements of the configuration. In this case, an audit could be applied to sampled baseline items to ensure that performance is consistent with specifications or to ensure that evolving documentation continues to be consistent with the developing baseline item. The constraints imposed on a software engineering effort or the specifications produced during the development activities might contain provisions which cannot be satisfied at the designated point in the life cycle.
Well, a change control board might just be the element that was missing. Loading the wrong FPGA version to a board could result in unpredictable behavior or component damage. By careful FPGA design configuration management and part programming and tracking, serious problems can be avoided. It is not enough to always have access to the latest design FPGA version.
Measurements of SCM processes provide a good means for monitoring the effectiveness of SCM activities on an ongoing basis. These measurements are useful in characterizing the current state of the https://globalcloudteam.com/glossary/configuration-control-board-ccb/ process, as well as in providing a basis for making comparisons over time. Analysis of the measurements may produce insights leading to process changes and corresponding updates to the SCMP.
Wherever the change originates, capturing it is important to begin the process. Once the FPGA design has been captured and compiled and initially downloaded to the HW target, configuration tracking needs to be maintained at the board level in the lab. Efficient real-world debugging is much easier when as many variables as possible are removed when trying to determine the source of a problem. ▪Change description, reason for change and who made the change, current revision of the design, date, time, etc.
It shows the configuration control process divided into three segments, which are detailed in Figures 6-2, 6-3 and 6-4, respectively. In this example, code management systems support the operation of software libraries by controlling access to library elements, coordinating the activities of multiple users, and helping to enforce operating procedures. Other tools support the process of building software and releasing documentation from the software elements contained in the libraries. Tools for managing software change requests support the change control procedures applied to controlled software items. Other tools can provide database management and reporting capabilities for management, development, and quality assurance activities. As mentioned above, the capabilities of several tool types might be integrated into SCM systems, which in turn are closely coupled to various other software activities.
In this case, SCM planning for interface control takes place within the context of the system-level process. To prevent confusion about who will perform given SCM activities or tasks, organizations to be involved in the SCM process need to be clearly identified. Specific responsibilities for given SCM activities or tasks also need to be assigned to organizational entities, either by title or by organizational element. The overall authority and reporting channels for SCM should also be identified, although this might be accomplished at the project management or quality assurance planning stage.